I was at the Temple yesterday for President Steve Veazey’s presentation of inspired counsel to the Community of Christ. My soul was moved unexpectedly several times during the service. I was first struck by the Spirit in our singing and words from the Gospel of John. More than once, I was moved to tears. But, I also felt a deep conviction of the Holy Spirit in President Veazey’s words of counsel to us. I want to share a portion of that testimony.
First, thinking about President Veazey’s counsel, I’m aware again about something unique about our tradition as a Christian people. I’m not interested in drudging up old adages about Restoration distinctives. Other movements, too, hear and respond to God’s call to prophetic witness. But, I honor the faith and responsibility being called forth by our “theocratic democracy.” Considering President Veazey’s inspired counsel in the light of the issues before us, we are amidst the profound moments of our theocratic democracy. We’re being asked to discern and respond to President Veazey’s inspired counsel to us. We are not being expected in some sectarian or cultish fashion to blindly accept or mindlessly follow our spiritual leaders. Instead, the difficulty of the issues and call to witness before us in these words form a responsibility to faith that takes form in our personal response. To believe the inspired counsel given yesterday, we are called closer to God, to act in faith in accordance to God’s will. We are not only asked to consider President’s Veazey’s preparation, faith and discernment in some vote to agree or disagree. We are also being asked to take responsibility for our common faith in the Holy Spirit’s direction. Ultimately, the words offered ask us as a community to respond to our call to be disciples in response to his mission. To accept President Veazey’s words of counsel, we must take greater responsibility for our sacraments and relationships with others. But more, we are also asked to accept the stewardship of our common faith and its witness to Christ’s Gospel among the nations and cultures in which God’s prophetic Spirit flows and seeks expression.
After my experience yesterday, I reaffirm my testimony that God guides and moves among us as a movement. The confirmation of my testimony will not be in the church’s consensus about the rightness or wrongness of President Veazey’s words, but in whether or not we respond as a people. More than a church, the Community of Christ is called to be a movement. We are being called in a way different than before to trust in God’s direction and pursue our faith in God’s mission to the World.
I also share my personal testimony of God’s Holy Spirit revealed in President Veazey’s words to us. It is not the language or individual terms, themselves, that are divine or inspired. It is the challenge and responsibility they offer to us…if we respond and believe.
In my personal study and discernment about the future church – particularly, the role of scripture in our life together and the disparate voices on issues before us - I, too, have been called back to my personal witness and certain scriptures that President Veazey referred to. In particular, I, too, have been drawn to listen to Paul’s witness in Galatians 3:28 and his testimony about God’s ongoing revelation and new creation in Christ. Against the voices of division, the questions about identity and sexuality, as well as about just relationships, the role of our sacraments, and pursuit of peace in our neighborhoods and culture are not alien to the Gospel. They are not “of man” or politically motivated, but matters central to our faith. In other words, they are not questions of divine knowledge, but divine trust in God’s ongoing reign and movement. As matters pertaining to life together today, they are a matter of our prophetic witness of Christ amidst the world. To be called to discipleship, stewardship, and shared responsibility for that witness could be nothing other than prophetic. For that, President Veazey, I offer God praise and you thanks.

I have moments in my dissertation writing when I feel like I’m a horrible writer and I need to just to quit. I go down an emotional rabbit hole. Writing has never been my strong point. I’ve had moments in my academic career when professors have read my work and told me they had no idea what I was saying. Of course, I knew exactly what I was saying. I never really learned whether it was a problem of my choice of words, writing style, or that my flow of thought was just plain incoherent. Maybe it is a mix of these things. But, internally, the problem I feel is that I get lost amidst the trees. It’s not that I don’t understand what I’m saying or thinking. It’s that I see so many questions and connections at once, I get lost in perspective. And, as I get lost in the possibilities of one sentence or paragraph, I make the mistake of wanting to put too much in a sentence. That can make it difficult to cipher what I’m saying.
The dissertation process, however, requires me to do what I don’t feel good at doing: outlining a set of ideas in an argument that I can deconstruct by simply taking another angle on my own line of thinking. This is horribly frustrating for me because beneath all the critical thinking I am fearful of being discovered as an impostor, an idiot, simple-minded, or someone found impersonating someone worthy of a PhD.
If you feel lost in your church right now, you are not alone.
Over the last few weeks, I’ve been tackling problems that don’t revolve around ethereal stuff like “new ideas,” “vision” and other theological talk that can lack consequence. In fact, I’ve been so sucked into these challenges that I’ve begun to wonder whether discussing the church’s problems or their solutions really matters if the people in the discussion aren’t somehow personally and materially invested. They, somehow, need to be givers or prepared to become givers to what we share. A giver gives so much more than money. But, they give money, too. They give to something beyond themselves.
We struggle on both sides. In the church, we have many congregations that are deeply attached to their houses of worship. 75-90% of the time, those churches are paid for. These buildings are the ebenesers, the alters, of a previous generation. They are the hallmark of our denominationalism. We are no longer a frontier movement. We now have our church on the corner. This was the success of previous generations. Because of them, I would bet 75-90% of our congregations have no mortgage, only maintenance and monthly bills. Five to fifty gather in them once a week.
Outside the church, we also live in a day when the relationship between spirituality and economics is wholly out of whack. Unbriddled greed and a world sold out to the god of wealth and wealth-production, has horribly contorted the relationship of our economic and spiritual needs. All around, I see its effects in “liberal” and conservative forms. Many Christians have literally sold out the doctrine of economic wealth and prosperity: we can spend ourselves out of crises, whether spiritual or economic. This not only makes absolutely no sense, wealth and prosperity – no matter how American – are false gods. They are not the good news, but a completely alien form of religion and spirituality. Christian faith and the call to prophetic community operates on a different kind of sense. Christ’s community is not based on getting what you pay for. Nor, is its growth based on profits or consuming more. The salvation of the church, on earth as it is in heaven, is based on what is given and what is shared: the shared grace, disciplines, practices, vision, and shared convictions. The church is a witness to community.
become my followers, let them deny themselves and take up their cross and follow me. 35 For those who want to save their life will lose it, and those who lose their life for my sake, and for the sake of the gospel, will save it. 36 For what will it profit them to gain the whole world and forfeit their life? 37 Indeed, what can they give in return for their life?
Just because we know the end of the story, this does not mean we fully understand what Jesus was trying to say to the disciples and the crowd that day. Even if we feel like we understand the meaning of Jesus’ crucifixion and resurrection, it doesn’t mean we fully know what Jesus was trying to say to us in those words today. Dietrich Bonhoeffer, the famous Christian theologian and resistor of Nazi Germany, stated it so dramatically clear: “When Jesus calls us, he bids us come and die.” (Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Cost of Discipleship)
To be Jesus’ disciple, Jesus only asked that we leave what we know behind and offer our new lives to him. This doesn’t take certainty or self-assurance. It takes faith.



On June 6th, I posted a piece entitled “